Thursday, September 12, 2013

First Post: "Finessing & Hybridizing"


Question to think about:
Give specific examples of areas where you feel confident in your planning, teaching, and assessing and areas you feel you need to learn more about. Given what you know so far about your classroom context, what opportunities might be available to you for learning this year? What ideas do you have about how you might want to ‘finesse’ or ‘hybridize’ your literacy practices?

In terms of Language Arts and Literacy, I have always loved reading, and have felt fairly confident in it. With that in mind, I enjoy discussing books, and book discussions were stressed in TE 402. I feel that I could teach meaning, vocabulary, and comprehension through book discussions; however, I would like to become even more confident in that. From 402, I feel I can plan some lessons with Common Core in mind. I need to become more familiar with the Novi Districts Literacy Curriculum though. I think I need to learn in just about every aspect, not in a negative way, but just because I think as teachers we can always be learning and improving and changing methods. I want to specifically learn about assessments, both informal and formal. I would like to gain knowledge on how my mentor teachers manage to balance instruction for standardized tests, as well as their own methods. I am excited to be able to observe how they “finesse” and “hybridize”. My classroom has a couple ELL students, so I will be anxious to see how my mentor teachers tailor to these students’ needs.
I enjoyed many of the ways that Emily and Celina finessed and hybridized their teaching methods. Celina used Writer’s Workshop, which I have already seen in my classroom and I think that is huge. The students are excited to write in writer’s workshop, and express themselves. I also agree with Celina’s idea of integrating writing with reading, “because she could not, in good conscience, teach reading without having students write” (Kertsen & Pardo, 2007, p. 150).  I would also use some of Emily’s methods of hybrid, such as using read-aloud to model fluency, and work on comprehension and vocabulary development (p. 152). She worked to meet the needs of her ELL students that were not getting support through using the Basal Readers. I am struggling to find specific examples of how I would personally finesse and hybridize, because so far I have seen practices in my classroom that I would definitely use myself, and I am still becoming familiar with the curriculum. My teachers were working on “The First 10 Days”, which went through informational text and multiple-choice questions that prepare students for the MEAP. While my mentor teacher, and her teammate are going through the procedures of this, they are using their own words and pace. For example, process of elimination was set-aside for a specific day in these guidelines; however, my mentor teachers just happened to talk about it earlier because it was the natural flow of the instruction and conversation. I think a big part of finesse and hybridizing is keeping the students’ current needs in mind, and making changes as you go. I especially liked Celina’s profile because,
she was not afraid to abandon ideas that were not working and to try something different. She let her own experiences and her students’ reactions guide her decisions” (p. 150). I think this idea if huge in terms of managing standardized tests, and aligned curriculum and deciding what is best for students.

Since I am a little stumped on how I would finesse and hybridize at this moment in time, I am interested to hear your responses to this question! Thanks :)

Source:
Kersten & Pardo (2007). Finessing and hybridizing: Innovative literacy practices in
reading first classrooms. The Reading Teacher, 61(2), 146-154

5 comments:

  1. Much similar to you, Haley, I also feel that I have always been fairly confident in my own reading and writing skills. With the few lessons that I have taught so far in my teaching career, literacy has definitely been something that I feel the most confident in. I have done read alouds with previous classes as well as once so far this year, and that is definitely something that I feel comfortable doing. Also, in my placement last year, I taught a brief lesson to my first graders where I had a character discussion and writing activity following my read aloud. I feel fairly comfortable with these literacy teaching activities as well. I have also had experience with literacy centers, which is something that I feel like I could orchestrate in my own classroom with a decent amount of confidence.

    In terms of my classroom this year, I also feel that I would like to have more of a chance to see my classroom's literacy progress a little more as the year goes on. So far I have seen my mt introduce a reader's notebook as well as a writer's notebook and we have been working with our students to build their reading stamina, but I would definitely like to see more of the curriculum teaching unfold. Also, I know that Novi uses accelerated reader as well as fountas and pinnell (don't know if I'm spelling that right) assessments, which I would definitely like to learn more about.

    I am also a little confused about the reading as well. From what I understand, hybridizing and finessing are terms being used to describe the two different ways that teachers typically react to different state or district policies that are being thrown at them? So, hybridizing would be used for a teacher who kind of mixes together their own personal teaching pedagogy with whatever policies that they have to adhere to, and finessing would be used for a teacher that is less accepting of certain policies inflicted upon their teaching? Not sure if that is correct, but that is what I got from the reading.

    Applying that to my own teaching, I would like to think of myself as someone who would use the hybridizing method. I know that a lot of times teachers are given policies that can be very restricting and unfair, but it is still a job and you have to follow whatever rules and regulations that your district/state has. With that said, I would be sure to maintain a grasp on my teaching pedagogy and still continue to use my own teaching style.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Throughout college I had a handful of literacy/language arts courses that have prepared me to plan, teach, and assess my future students. Last year in one of my courses we used a book called, “Assessment for Reading Instruction”. This book gave multiple assessment examples for content areas like, fluency, comprehension, word recognition, etc. I had to give my students a pre-assessment to see what my students thrived at and what they could improve on. Afterwards I would target a group of students that could improve in a certain area, taught my lesson and then assessed them. I feel very confident in this area. Throughout my courses we also had to use the common core standards to create lessons, which I also feel very confident in. My mentor last year had to use a language arts curriculum, but she felt that it did not prepare her students enough. She created other literacy activities for the students, exposed them to other books (besides the basal reading books), etc. For this experience I feel confident that I can finesse and hybridize my instruction because I’ve seen that just because its required by your administrators or the state doesn’t mean that it will work. As teachers we cannot just teach what we are told and let our students suffer because their needs aren’t being meet. I praise the two teachers in this reading (Emily & Celina) because they recognize the hurdles that teachers deal with on a daily basis, while the people who are making the textbooks do not (pg.146).
    Do I plan on finessing and hybridizing my instruction during my internship year? Yes, but in order to do so I agree with Haley that I haven’t seen enough literacy instruction or know enough about the districts requirements to have a plan on what I would change. I will be curious to see how my teachers instruct literacy and what they do for the struggling students/ELL’s. Celina did use a writer’s workshop and my class does the same, but I am unsure if this is a district requirement or my mentor’s choice. The students seem to enjoy what they are writing about in their notebooks, but again unsure if this is a requirement or not. I know that the district is serious about writing because it is on their monument for success. It seems like what I’ve seen so far literacy is taken very seriously.
    I also enjoyed the many ways that Emily and Celina finessed and hybridized their classrooms like Haley mentioned. Like I mentioned above it is important to make changes to the classroom because times are changing and we have to change with them. Its just like the latest “21 century classroom”, many schools are trying to adapt and bring in technology to achieve this new style. The bottom line is you have to do what is best for your students at that given time. It may not work the next year, but its because you have a new group of students with different needs.
    I agree with Haley that at this point it is hard to determine what we would finesse and hybridize. We need to know more about the curriculum, our students, our mentors, etc. We know it’s important to do based on our previous experiences. We can relate when the text said, “Classrooms are complex environments where teachers are “dilemma managers”, negotiating their own identity and the teaching challenges that arise daily” (pg. 146). We’ve seen these challenges arise in our own teaching as well as our mentors. We have to adapt and make the best decisions for our students because if we don’t they are the ones that will suffer.

    ReplyDelete
  3. After teaching a few lessons last year I feel fairly confident in executing a lesson, particularly in science. I think my lesson planning and assessing needs the most work. To be honest I am not confident at all in language arts. I love reading and I am a confident reader but I am overwhelmed by the sheer number of different processes that are involved in language arts. I think it is a subject that has the most going on in a lesson. Reading that article was a little intimidating to see all that the teachers had to consider for one lesson. Language arts take up so much of the day because of its importance. There are so many decisions to be made as well in language arts.
    In walled lake we have already begun testing the students in reading and writing and I am going to help my teacher to grade all of the reading and writing tests this Monday. She plans to group the kids for reading based on their skills so that they can work on what they are struggling with together. Some students have trouble only with fluency while others have problems solely with comprehension as well as students that struggle in both those areas. When the students were not being tested my teacher was integrating the read-alouds with the writing assignments the students had. The curriculum she is using encourages the integration of writing and reading. I am excited to practice integration this year because I know it can be a powerful tool in any classroom.
    That’s what I understood hybridization to be, integrating, similarly to Natalie. I agree though those terms were difficult to understand in the reading. As far as I understood, the hybridization was an integration during one lesson of requirements as well as what the teacher wanted. I understood finessing to be the teaching of both requirements and desires but not together.
    I think I would prefer to hybridize, similar to Natalie, in my classroom because it seems like the option that has less material involved. So far in my classroom we have yet to finish an activity on time. We always seem to carry over into the next day. I believe this to be a result of it being the beginning of the school year but also a result of the amount of material that is to be taught each year. I also think hybridization allows you to incorporate other subjects into language arts. With NCLB, almost the entire day in dedicated to language arts and math. The fourth grade teachers at my school all teacher science till they finish a unit, take a benchmark assessment then teach a unit of social studies and take a benchmark assessment. There’s just not enough time in the day for both social studies and science. As a science major I really want to integrate science into the readings as well as social studies because the students just are not experiencing enough of either of these subjects. I did not realize until being in the classroom all day how NCLB has shaped the classroom.

    ReplyDelete
  4. After reflecting on all of your comments, I agreed with much of what was said in the group. I like Elizabeth and Natalie's ideas about hybridization, because it seems like less materials. Elizabeth made a good point- I had always assumed I was strongest at Language Arts because it was my favorite subject; however, there is SO much going into it. There seems to be extreme pressure in this subject, in terms of testing and comparing scores for different districts. This article overwhelmed me in that aspect too, and also shed a new light for me on NCLB.

    Like Whitney and Natalie, I continue to believe I need more time in my classroom to observe my mentor and see how I would hybridize, as well as get a better idea of my resources and curriculum requirement. Our first project I think will help me gain a better grip of these requirements and curriculum. I have started to engage in more conversations with my teacher about the literacy instruction, and what curriculum they follow.

    ReplyDelete